Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Global SITREP E2-17: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP)





UPDATED 1700 EDT on 20 December 2017: The above video, known as "FLIR1" is the second of three videos from the 14 November 2004 USS Nimitz UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) incident off the coast of (my beloved hometown) San Diego, California that has been declassified and released to the public. I have embedded (hopefully for a long duration) the URL of this video into this SITREP, the webpage source of which is also linked above. In several days of studying this since incident it was first brought to my attention about three days ago, this is the best webpage yet viewed from a purely technical standpoint. A partially redacted but must read pilot report of this incident is here. The first video, the 34-seconds long "GIMBAL" video first seen this past Sunday, and its associated webpage are here.

Description of HUD (Heads Up Display) seen in the FLIR1 video as filmed by a US Navy F/A-18 Super Hornet using the Raytheon AN/ASQ-228 Advanced Targeting Forward-Looking Infrared (ATFLIR) pod.
In sum, this approximately 2 minute 30 second duration video is the real deal. For technogeeks (like me) the image above has been included as it provides descriptions of all the data points displayed on the F/A-18F Super Hornet's (call sign Fast Eagle 110 and wing-man Fast Eagle 100) heads-up display as seen by the pilot and the weapons sensor operator (WSO) during the incident. As the video plays subtitles appear at the bottom of the video frame because there is no voice track on the FLIR1 recording. Most interesting thing here is that the infrared sensor detected no heat plume emanating from the UAP, yet it is moving at a very high rate of speed, and darts out of the FLIR frame to the left at incredible speed just as the video ends. Based upon the known speed of the Super Hornet the object clearly accelerated well past the speed of sound, yet no shock wave or heated vapor trail is evident.


 VFA-41 Black Aces were embarked on USS Nimitz in late 2002. This is the F/A-18F Super Hornet, call sign 'Fast Eagle 110' as it appeared in November 2002, two years prior to the UAP incident. 'Fast Eagle 110' was piloted by the source of the report discussed in this SITREP. Click to enlarge. USS Nimitz seen in the background. Five minutes of data mining located this image here.

Why is this important? 

Because this is the first time a first-rate vetted report of an obviously intelligently controlled unknown aerial system has come out of the U.S. Government. This incident has been verified by the Navy pilots themselves. This is about an aerial system without obvious means of lift (wings), describable or detectable propulsion, or piloting, and that the object was capable of maneuvering in defiance of all known physical laws of aerodynamics. Based upon USN tracking data the UAP instantaneously accelerated to a speed in excess of 2,400 mph in one particular maneuver. The UAP in question literally played with the F/A-18F Super Hornet which in 2004 were the very best combat aircraft in the world. The UAP maintained a flight profile of total tactical dominance over the Super Hornet at all times during this incident.

Given everything that is currently going on in this world, and I mean everything, one critically important question and a couple lesser important questions require answers. 

Why release this now? And why is it apparently only left-of-center media and personalities that have been involved in this release? 

Being on high alert for grand-scale delusion and great deception, something like this completely out of the blue, at this time in history, is like a bombshell with a delayed fuse detonation. A potential bunker buster in other words. Right-of-center media and personalities are bah-hum-bugging the report in total, (ahem, FoxNews, a flying Tic-Tac? Really?) and likely in ignorance of the astounding, unprecedented technical aspects evident in the DoD videos that have been released, thus far at least. There may be more coming.

It is often stated here to expect the unexpected, but this is something else again; something way off the charts.

17 comments:

  1. Thank you brother Sean. I always appreciate your insight!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Who within the DoD (the Pentagon) authorized within the past year a review and declassification of this information which clearly had previously been at the level of codeword, compartmentalized TS/SCI or SAP data?

    Is this a "Deep State" operation?

    ReplyDelete
  3. There are also very relevant articles on this subject at TheAviationist.com and PopularMechanics.com.

    Biblically, I'm comparing this incident to Ezekiel 1.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Going back to the MidEast situation with SITREP E3-17 this evening. Powerful I&W are evident today.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sean, this may be totally off base but I find it absolutely amazing that this practically immediately follows the Revelation 12 sign that we all watched unfold in the heavens on Aug 21. Correlation?? God in charge...and He is moving in mysterious and powerful ways.

    ReplyDelete
  6. LD,

    The UAP incident occurred on 14 November 2004.

    It was just made public on 16 December 2017.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hey Sean,

    I'm curious, why do you think this information was released at all? And why before Christmas? I would say it's almost been lost in the news....but something like this can't stay lost...I mean, even I read about it and I only check on the news a couple of times a week. I can't fathom why they decided it needed to be released. It seems like one of those things that the government would take to their grave.

    Curious

    ReplyDelete
  8. JessC,

    Exactly the points you make here are what struck me right off the bat.

    The video is 13 years old; it was very highly classified, and as you say this is the kind of thing we'd normally expect to maybe hear tin-foil hat rumors about, but never, ever hard evidence like this, and all of it verifiable. Then I realized that it came from the New York Times - voice of the Global Order - and Politico - voice of the hard Left in the USA.

    Then I watched a replay of the May 2017 60 Minutes segment done by Lara Logan, whom I do respect as a genuine article in the near-dead profession of investigative journalism. Her interview of Robert Bigelow.

    May as well post to include that link here for the record. Video will pop up at the bottom.

    BIGELOW AEROSPACE

    So why now? Supreme distraction? Who gains from this?

    What do I think is the agenda behind the release of this? At the moment I truly do not know.

    What I do know is that the UAP object was real but where it came from remains completely unknown.

    I also know based upon the data seen and reviewed thus far is that the 2004 incident was very real and what is seen in the FLIR data recordings is still beyond technological comprehension 13 years later.

    This is reminding me once again of something I personally witnessed back in 1973 on the Jersey shore. It was a UAP event, an airborne, low-altitude craft of some sort, at close range (100 yards perhaps) with an unobstructed view. I still don't know what it was except that I don't believe it was of this earth.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I have been fully expecting an "announcement" anytime of confirmation of ET life. I'm not saying this will be how they explain away the rapture, but I think all things are in play at this point. As Sean stated in an earlier post, war is deception, and we ARE at war....daily. I expect the level of disinformation & subversion to escalate from here on out. Why release this now indeed....

    ReplyDelete
  10. Lance,

    Indeed, so have I been expecting such an announcement. My take is that this announcement is part or a parcel of the "strong delusion" the Lord sends per Paul in 2 Thessalonians 2:11. I link II Thessalonians directly with Matthew 24:24.

    The "elect" shall not be deceived in this because they hold on to the truth of His Word by the Holy Spirit. That's why it's not possible for the true Bride of Christ to fall for this coming announcement and the deception it entails.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hey Sean,
    After watching the video and reading the report, I saw where it left at an extreme rate of speed. I don't think it was mentioned but if it was a natural UAP it would have broken the sound barrier and I would think it would have been heard and reported. If not, than I'm going with it as a deception from the principalities and powers from the demonic side.

    ReplyDelete
  12. jmoll,

    The event occurred at sea, away from any population center. The only eyewitnesses were the pilots and naval radar or electronic warfare technicians.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Gotcha, wasn't sure how close to shore. Still, I agree with you and Lance it's a last days deception.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, it may be that what I said might only be partially correct.

      There are beau coup reports of unexplained sonic booms from all over the country.

      Delete
    2. Interesting, I can see a real solid type vehicle following the laws of physics and breaking the sound barrier. Do you think demons are able to produce such a vehicle out of thin air.?

      Delete
  14. I think these vehicles have been around for a very long time. Ezekiel gave us the first account of a vehicle which still inspires awe.

    I saw what I would describe as a unidentified aerial phenomenon back in the 70s. Actually chased it across town and down to the beachfront. Orange-Gold in color, glowing, about 100 feet in the air. It ejected some kind of molten slag into the ocean and took of silently and was out of sight in a couple of seconds. Hundreds of people saw this because it was summertime on the Jersey shore. Demonic? I don't think it was; but I am also sure it was not of this world.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I guess I never considered any of these sighting to be from God's side being in our atmosphere but I guess Elijah's fiery chariot picking him up could be considered one of these sightings so I do retract it as demonic.
    That sure was an interesting UAP you saw.

    ReplyDelete

Only comments in which the author includes his/her name will be published on this blog