![]() |
| Helios Highway (attribution in image) |
Kataib Hezbollah and Kataib Sayyid al-Shuhada within the past two weeks launched deadly rocket attacks against US and Coalition forces bases in the area of Erbil, Iraq. A Philippino contractor was killed and American personnel were injured in the rocket attacks.
An anonymous U.S. source reported the strikes were carried out by USAF F-15E following surveillance by a UAE-based USAF Bombardier E-11A aircraft and its Battlefield Airborne Communications Node (BACN) over the area.
In the midst of Biden Administration efforts to re-engage Iran in a nuclear agreement this strike sends a clear message about U.S. resolve to protect American and Allied forces in Iraq and the entire Persian Gulf region.
Update 27 February 2021: An aei.org OpEd published yesterday has quickly called into question the Biden Administration's narrative on the airstrike in Syria. Point blank, the OpEd reports (a good assessment!) that problems with the strike are two-fold. First, the wrong targets were hit, and second, the Biden Administration's claim that the strikes were proportional are erroneous at best. They were not even remotely proportional, they were a wrist-slap instead of a sledgehammer blow. A truly proportional retaliatory strike would have Guam-based B-1B Lancer strategic bombers and their stand-off weaponry striking an Iranian air base as the U.S. and Coalition base in Erbil, Iraq was struck.
Instead of causing Iran and its proxy militias to stand down, the Biden-approved retaliation strike will exacerbate regional tensions and lead to more significant escalations in the region.

