Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Arguments Against a Muslim Antichrist

by Bill Salus

Troublesome times, filled with stage setting prophetic signs, have many concerned they live in the last generation. As such, many eschatologists field questions about the Antichrist whose reign of terror dominates the final generation.

Topping the list is the curiosity over his origin. Will he be a Jew, Gentile, Muslim, or perhaps a Supernatural being like the Nepilim in the ancient Days of Noah?

According to the majority consensus of several experts interviewed by Dr. David Reagan of Lamb and Lion Ministries, there doesn’t seem to be a Jewish bone in Antichrist’s body. Their views can be watched here or read in my blog article called “Is the Antichrist, a Jew, Gentile, or Supernatural.”

Additionally, those pondering the supernatural origins of the Antichrist comprise a minority thus far. In fact, the first time I had heard about it was in a radio interview I hosted with end time’s expert and co-founder of Rapture Ready, Terry James. During the Prophecy Update radio program Terry made a compelling argument for a supernatural Antichrist. This fascinating interview took place on November of 2010 and can be heard here.

However, through a process of deductive reasoning, it appears most scholars believe the Antichrist is either a non-Muslim Gentile or a Muslim Gentile. Traditional teaching points to a non-Muslim Gentile Antichrist rising out of the Revived Roman Empire. Advocates of this view point to Daniel 9:26, which says this crazed individual will be a Roman. The prophecy declares the Antichrist will come out of the people who destroyed Jerusalem and the Jewish Temple, an event fulfilled in 70 A.D. by the Roman Empire.

In January 2009 I wrote an article called “Does Daniel Debunk the Assyrian Antichrist.” This article hit a sensitive nerve among those interested in the origin of the Antichrist and prompted 143 blogs, including many from author Joel Richardson of the bestselling book “The Islamic Antichrist.”

Recently, I was asked by Dr. David Reagan to pen my position on several questions related to the Antichrist. One of them was regarded with the potential for a Muslim Antichrist. Some of the best teaching on this controversial subject is written in a transcript entitled, “The Muslim Antichrist Theory and Evaluation” by Dr. David Reagan.

Dr. Reagan's excellent article points out that Islamic eschatology also has an Antichrist called the Dajjal and that similarities between the Islamic Dajjal and biblical Antichrist exist. Muslim Antichrist advocates often use these similarities to argue their point. However, any similarities between the two are inadmissible due to the fact that Islamic scribes had several thousand years of previously recorded biblical prophecy available to them, which enabled them to fabricate the features of the Dajjal.

Summarized below are a few of the reasons I don’t believe the Antichrist will be a Muslim.

To hypothesize the Antichrist could be a Muslim, which is a relatively new paradigm shift in thinking, ignores the prophetic ramifications of Psalm 83, Ezekiel 38, and the first four seal judgments of Revelation 6:1-7. Prophetic insights written in Isralestine, The Ancient Blueprints of the Future Middle East, suggest Psalm 83, and possibly Ezekiel 38, appears to occur before the Antichrist rides in on the world stage as the "white horseman" of the apocalypse in Rev. 6:1.

As pointed out in the Psalm 83 and Ezekiel 38 arguments below, the fulfillment of both prophecies will negatively impact the religion of Islam. Therefore, by the time the Antichrist emerges, Islam should be undergoing a deepening crisis in faith thereby hindering any Muslim's bid for world worship.

The Psalm 83 Argument

Psalm 83 is a confederation of ten predominately Muslim populations that will invade Israel to reclaim Palestine for the Palestinians. They will be decisively defeated by the Israeli Defense Forces as per Ezekiel 25:14, Obadiah 1:18, and elsewhere. This defeat will serve as a severe “punch to the gut” of the Islamic faith. Muslims worldwide will be shocked to witness today’s tiny Israel militarily overpower their present surrounding Arab foes.

The Ezekiel 38 Argument

In the aftermath of the I.D.F. victory of Psalm 83, the predominately Muslim nine-member coalition of invaders of Ezekiel 38:1-6 will make their bid to invade Israel to capture Israeli plunder and booty. We are informed in Ezekiel 38:18 - 39:6 that the invaders will meet their doom via the divine doings of the Lord rather than the I.D.F. The defeat of the Ezekiel invaders will be nothing less than a powerful “uppercut to the jawbone” of Islam.

In the aftermath of these two victories the downward slide of Allah will be observable as Muslims worldwide will become increasingly disenchanted with their Islamic faith. This is already occurring. Fueled by the Internet and social networks, many Mideast Muslim youths are looking beyond the confines of seventh-century Islam and state censored media for a brighter democratic future. Allah’s downward slide partially fulfills the prophecy in Zephaniah 2:11, which foretells the fall of all false gods.

These two Pre-Tribulation prophetic events, Psalm 83 and Ezekiel 38, should assure that Islam is both crippled and compromised by the time the predicted wars of Revelation 6 occur. These apocalyptic wars predict indiscriminate death and destruction worldwide putting Islam well within its sites. As a result, Islam should be “knocked out for the final ten – count” before the midpoint of the seven – year tribulation arrives.

In addition to the objections identified above, 2 Thessalonians 2:4 declares the Antichrist will someday have the audacity to declare himself as god. Such a declaration flies in the face of Islam’s primary tenet that “There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is his prophet or messenger.” According to the prophecy the Antichrist opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.

Once the Antichrist fulfills the 2 Thess. 2:4 prophecy a fatwa would certainly be issued to assassinate him if he was a Muslim. When this fact is pointed out to Muslim Antichrist advocates they often point out that Revelation 13:3-4 and Rev. 17:7-11 suggests the Antichrist will die. But, they argue these passages also suggest he will subsequently resurrect to rule the world.

The logical question then arises, "Wouldn't that prompt the issuance of another fatwa against his life?" In order to avoid an unending vicious cycle of fatwa, death, and resurrection they speculate that fatwa’s calling for the Antichrist’s death ultimately cease to be issued. Such a conclusion is difficult to support scripturally. Thus, the 2 Thessalonians argument also opposes the Muslim Antichrist theory.

Furthermore, attempts to identify a Muslim Antichrist often require historical revisionism and sensational newspaper exegesis. Historical revisionism occurs when Muslim Antichrist advocates discount Roman responsibility over the destruction of Jerusalem and the Jewish Temple. They teach Arab conscripts, even though they were subservient under Roman rule, did the dirty work. This argument is highly suspect and easily refuted. (Refer to the blogs here).

Newspaper exegesis occurs by focusing on Islam’s adversarial role in current Mideast events rather than appropriately ordering the Israeli war prophecies described in Psalm 83 and Ezekiel 38. Muslim Antichrist advocates attempt to give Islam longevity by conveniently incorporating these prophecies into the campaign of Armageddon.

It is commonly taught that the final Armageddon battle, whereby the Antichrist and his armies are defeated, occurs during the latter part of the seven-year Tribulation period. Many, including myself, believe the Psalm 83 and Ezekiel 38 prophecies occur independently from, and in advance of, the final Armageddon battle. Therefore as stated above, before Armageddon comes Islam will be “knocked out for the ten – count

It appears humanity is about to witness the fulfillment of Psalm 83 followed by Ezekiel 38. These two powerful prophetic events should render Islamic eschatology, which has no Godly inspiration apart from that clumsily plagiarized out of the bible, useless. There will be a biblical Antichrist and he may be alive today. But, it is highly doubtful that he will be a Muslim.


hartdawg said...

daniel chapter 9 says the people the prince who will come ( anti christ) will destroy the city and the temple. PEOPLE OF THE PRINCE WHO WILL COME! The romans HOW CLEAR CAN YOU GET? the 4Th KINGDOM! HOW CLEAR CAN YOU GET? THE BIBLE IS VERY CLEAR, NO MUSLIM ANTICHRIST!!! How can people not get this? I don't understand

SeanOsborne said...


The short, simple and most unfortunate answer is that those people absolutely prefer eisegesis over exegesis. Their works are human-derived; they are devoid of the Holy Spirit.

hartdawg said...

well...its official Fatah and Hamas are now united. looks like Egypt is officially against isreal. now it seems that's all that's left is for jordan to drop their peace treaty with israel. is that accurate?

Anonymous said...

Hello, Sean, I don't know you, but had read with gratitude in the past of your exposing Walid Shoebat, so thought to call to your attention that he is visciously slandering a new Christian: Mosab Hassan Yousef (a/k/a "Son of Hamas". The false accusation that Mosab is a "double agent" has gone viral over the last 2 days. (basically, Mosab is anti-Zionist, never pretended otherwise, but totally renounced violence & manifests a Spirit-filled new creation work begun in him, not completed, & Walid, of all people, is saying his political view, disagreeable though it is, makes him a duper & a double agent!) Please pray over this & perhaps you might even be led to help out here, Walid is really slamming him hard.

Great Grany 5 said...

I so totally agree with Bill about the unMuslim nationality of the Antichrist. Even common sense is better than no sense at all but when you really study God's Word, all of this deception about who he is just sickens me. That proposal that Joel Richardson first presented in his book took me out of retirement, big time. I had almost got my combat boots on and Sword of Truth in hand when I heard the Holy Spirit say "This is MY battle".
The big difference in understanding and dividing God's word according to HIS purposes is the Holy Spirit and that young man needs to learn the lesson. Of course, if your main motive is selling a book, then you proceed to buck sound doctrine.

Thank you for sharing Bill's article and yes, for removing the cloak of lies from Walid Shoebat. What is their purpose? To deceive the very elect if POSSIBLE! Thank you Abba Father for giving us the Author of your scriptures so we don't have to be snagged.


hartdawg said...

hey Sean.....your good buddy walid shoebat is gonna be at the church I work at this coming Sunday. would you like me to give him a message for you? haha! or perhaps during the Q&A time ill ask him a "question" and prove he's Scripture twisting. any recommendations on what I should ask? or perhaps I'll just stay away like I did last time.

Anonymous said...


When you say "devoid of the holy spirit" do you mean their writings or their hearts?

SeanOsborne said...


The full sentence was, "Their works are human-derived; they are devoid of the Holy Spirit.

"Works" = their books and lectures on the subject.

"Human-derived" as in eisegesis.

"They" refers directly to "their works."

Their works are eisegetical which is not born of the Holy Spirit.

SeanOsborne said...


Staying away is the option I would choose.

hartdawg said...

yes I know... I was just messing:)

P. Doug said...

Sean, have you seen this, and do you have any comments on the issue? Here's the link:

SeanOsborne said...

I am actively investigating the claims being levied against Mosab Hassen Yousef.

Until my investigation is complete I will not condemn him nor allow anyone else to condemn him on this blog.

Once my investigation is complete I will post a blog entry addressing this subject.

hartdawg said...

Sean...your response to the claims is the most Biblical response I can think of.

SeanOsborne said...

Some anonymous individual commented:

"I do not condemn Mossab. I condemn his position toward Israel. He is a brother like any other semi liberal evangelical who doesn't understand Israel's place in God's heart."

Who are you to condemn anything?

Did God give you that power and forget to tell us about it?

Especially when you declare to the whole world that Mosab Hassan Yousef does not yet understand Israel's place in God's heart.

Have you lost your mind?

Do you condemn all babes in Christ because they do not yet understand certain things?

Pray that God forgives you as you have not forgiven your brother for what he does not yet understand.

Oh, but of course, upon your own granting of the saving grace of the Blood of the Lamb you immediately understood everything there is to know about everything, right?

Remember what our Lord said about the the sliver in your brother's eye and the log in your own?

Apparently not.

Now you know why I delete your comments to this blog.

Anonymous said...


I think you may have misunderstood my comments. I do not condemn Youssef. I do not judge his heart. I am not even judging him. But I am judging his stance against Israel as he now holds it as unbiblical. I'm sure you agree with me on this. I am not attacking him in the least hit. It is not an attack on him at all. I think we are on the same page about what the Svriputres say about Israel. We stand with Israel and wish for Youssef to come to understand this also. And the way we do this, is by explaining to him why his stance is not in accord with the Scriptures. Discipleship. Please do not misread my comments as if I am against this young brother in the Lord. In Him.

SeanOsborne said...


Let us clear the air here.

1.) I do not like unproven, anonymous, allegations against any of our brethren.

2.) You post anonymously. I think a real name need be attached to any such allegations; the rationale for this is extremely self-evident.

3.) Under my own name, I do reject Walid Shoebat's claims of being a former PLO terrorist based upon the truthful information provided me previously by a CIA counter-terrorist operative and Chief-of-Station in the MIddle East.

4.) This man has apprehended bona fide Palestinain/Islamic terrorists in operations that (unfortunately) became a part of the public record. His information is unimpeachable in this regard. Period.

5.) Do you really believe that Mosab Hassan Yousef duped the whole of the Israeli Shin Bet organization and his personal Shin Bet handler for a total of 10 years just to gain access to and for the purpose of duping American Evangelical supporters of Israel?

6.) Do you really think Mosab's Shin Bet handler would unambiguously risk his Shin Bet intelligence career in open U.S. Federal Court by publicly identifying himself on the chance that Mosab Hasan Yousef had totally duped him?

The facts as I understand them them are:

1.) Walid Shoebat hasn't "a leg" to stand upon in his totally unfounded allegations.

Have a nice day.

SeanOsborne said...


One more thing, please provide the Eshatology Today blog with PROOF that Mosab Hassan Yousef's stance against Israel is as you say it is.

Anything from Walid Shoebat is unacceptable.

SeanOsborne said...

Letter from Mosab to Walid