Sunday, November 24, 2013

Global SITREP B7-13: Evil Hearts Speaking Lies, Nothing Essential Has Changed

24 November 2013: Look closely at the above image. It confirms something that I also just learned a couple of days ago when looking at other stage-setting images of the Geneva negotiations with Iran on its nuclear weapons program.  Have we not, from the get-go, been informed by our media that what was occurring in Geneva was the UN IAEA, represented by the 5 permanent members of the United Nations Security Council plus Germany (P5+1), negotiating with Iran? What does the backdrop signage refer to? It says these negotiations are known as the "E3/EU+3 Iran Talks." Here's another image.

This one has all of the principles, all 8 players, with all 8 flags and the same E3/EU+3 Iran Talks banner. What a charade. It reminds me of the prophecy in Daniel 11:27:

"Both these kings’ hearts shall be bent on evil, and they shall speak lies at the same table; but it shall not prosper, for the end will still be at the appointed time."
It's not just two kings, but 7 "kings", with an eighth representing the whole of the European Union, or more precisely Britain, France, Germany, the EU (represented by the unqualified Catherine Ashton) plus the United States, Russia, China and the Islamic Republic of Iran. The effect is the same. All these kings sat at the same table and spoke lies to each other; but it is all to no avail because the end of their rule has been appointed by God.

President Barack Chamberlain
They think they have made a covenant that will prevent war. They have done the exact opposite, and they have lied to each other and to the whole world about it. They have made a covenant with death that guarantees war. In these images you are looking at the Munich of 1939 but it's Geneva 2013. 24 November 2013, a date which lives in infamy. That's what I think; that how I assess the current situation. I also know that the State of Israel rejects this covenant absolutely and completely. Israel is not bound by its self-deluding sentences, as we shall soon see.

Text of the E3/EU+3 Iran Talks Agreement

Farsi translation of the E3/EU+3 Agreement: Iran has 6 months from 24 November 2013 in which to build and test its first nuclear weapon. On that day this purchase of more time agreement will become null and void.

The only question is: When does Israel strike all of the Iranian nuclear infrastructure not mentioned in this agreement as an act of self-defense?

Addendum: Not 24 hours have passed since the E3/EU+3 Iran Agreement was signed and it became apparent to this analyst that the agreement, as awful as it is, may well become the vehicle by which the prophecy of Jeremiah 49:34-39 will come to its fulfillment in the near future. Therefore, I am directly linking this post with one that I began writing on 15 September 2010 and have updated twice since then, most recently in April of 2012:

Jeremiah 49: Will a Coalition of Nations Move Against Iran? (Yes, They Will!!)

The last update of the above is also directly linked with another very recent post on Eschatology Today:

Global SITREP B6-13: France, Israel and Saudi Arabia United in Preemption of Iranian Nukes

This evening it looks as though the coalition of nations I cited from Jeremiah's prophecy primarily consists of Israel, the GCC of the Arabian Peninsula and Pakistan.  Make no mistake, this is a nuclear-armed coalition of Sunni Muslim nations which find themselves in a strategic alliance with the State of Israel.  

Reports I received this afternoon indicate that in recent days Israeli military personnel were or still are conducting boots-on-the-ground inspections of Saudi military installations in preparation for strikes upon Iran. The source of these reports has been tied to Egyptian military officials.

In addition to this, there is another aspect to the coalition's military actions against Iran. That aspect is an active insurgency against the Ayatollah's regime currently being fought in Iran's easternmost and majority Sunni Muslim Sistan-Baluchistan province. Both Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are arming and otherwise supplying the insurgent militias from bases inside Pakistan's westernmost Balochistan province. The militia insurgency against Iran also has a component which comes out of western Afghanistan. 

It is this land component which appears primed to literally fulfill that aspect of the Jeremiah 49:34-39 prophecy, verse 37 in particular:

"For I will cause Elam to be dismayed before their enemies
And before those who seek their life.
I will bring disaster upon them,
My fierce anger,’ says the Lord;
‘And I will send the sword after them
Until I have consumed them."

I believe we will see the various aspects of this unprecedented military confrontation, both strategic and tactical, emerge ever more clearly in the days to come. It has become a regional race to bring about regime change in Iran prior to it achieving nuclear weapon capability. The Sunni-Shi'a war is now being fought on two fronts, in Lebanon and Syria in the west, and in eastern Iran itself. In addition to this we can expect an ethnic Arab uprising within western Iran, the heart of ancient Elam.

23 comments:

mark3210 said...

Another great update, Sean!

And good catch that the signage doesn't match what the press has called the talks for years.

I do remember there was a period of a few years when Bush was president when only Britain, France, and Germany were talking to Iran while the US was threatening sanctions.

mark3210 said...

We now have 2 public statements from Netanyahu this morning:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bN_k8JC0JwA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gi4EfkO7D6Y

Lujack Skylark said...

Great observation Sean!

Scipio said...

THX once again Sean, for your research. Though I love the Holidays, it continues to amaze that our populace has no idea of the seriousness of the coming war.
Does the same '3 weeks' or so, hold as the timing of Iran's nuke, or did the underground explosion delay that until early/mid 2014? THX.

mark3210 said...

I don't want to get super specific as far as more predictions, but in my mind the latest Israel could possibly wait now would be another week or so until the next new moon.

But it's certainly possible the Israeli fighter jets are already in the air.

Sean Osborne said...


"I also know that the State of Israel rejects this covenant absolutely and completely. Israel is not bound by its self-deluding sentences, as we shall soon see."

Translation: The IAF could go "wheels up" at any moment.

Sean Osborne said...

In case anyone is wondering, yes, I am aware of the analysis coming from the Tel Aviv University's Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) which holds that there's virtually no chance of Netanyahu ordering a strike on Iranian nuclear sites.

I disagree with that analysis given the place and time left for Iran to be prevented from developing nuclear weapon based upon the IAEA's own assessments.

By May 2014 it will more likely be too little and too late to stop Iran.

mark3210 said...

Sean,
I'm of the belief, as expressed by Naftali Bennett on Saturday night, that the deal makes a strike more likely, rather than less.

There's no longer anything for Israel to wait for. The sanctions regime has collapsed.

Besides this 6 month figure used by supporters of the deal means absolutely nothing. Obama never gave Israel a green light for 5 years now. That surely won't change until the day he leaves office.

mark3210 said...

Sean,
I'm just wondering what emotions you or others reading this are feeling right now as we wait through this last "calm before the storm".

Angry or calm? Patient or impatient? Confident or anxious?

Perhaps a combination of all of these?

Sean Osborne said...

Emotions?

I have to say no emotion is tied to mundane. or everyday events because the victory was already won by our Lord on the Cross.

The purpose here is to "Watch!" (as our Lord has instructed) these events transpire through the lens of Bible prophecy.

When actual fulfillment occurs or we see definitive process towards a specific fulfillment then the emotion is definitely Excitement!

hartdawg said...

I'll be honest, I feel impatience and a little frustration. It seems we leap 2 steps forward toward prophetic fulfillment then God holds back the prophetic clock. I try to remember that if God does hold back the prophetic clock, (and I'm not by any means saying that he does) it's for the salvation of souls. Meanwhile, as you said we watch.

mark3210 said...

Sean,
Iran's FM said today they will continue construction at Arak!

I'm also seeing news that US State Department admitted yesterday the 6 month agreement hasn't taken effect yet because a number of details still need to be worked out.

It's becoming more and more apparent that nothing was accomplished in Geneva to slow down Iran's march to the bomb.

Sean Osborne said...

1.) "Elements of a first step The first step would be time-bound, with a duration of 6 months, and renewable by mutual consent, during which all parties will work to maintain a constructive atmosphere for negotiations in good faith."

Has this provision been adhered to by any measure since Sunday, 24 November 2013?

Absolutely not.

2.)Iran announces that it will not make any further advances of its activities at the Natanz Fuel Enrichment Plant (1), Fordow (2), or the Arak reactor (3), designated by the IAEA as IR-40."

Is Iran abiding by this agreed to provision?

Absolutely not.

Iran says to continue building at Arak nuclear site despite deal

Iran is already in blatant violation of the "deal" it agreed to with the E3/EU+3 in Geneva.

The E3/EU+3 will call Iran onto the carpet immediately, or they, their national leadership and the agreement itself are as weak and incompetent as I believe they are.

Looking forward to the E3/EU+3 reaction.

mark3210 said...

Well, we now have France and Israel calling out Iran's violation in the Reuters article.

US, according to the AP says construction at Arak is OK!

I knew Obama was horrible from day one, but wow! So pathetic!

Meanwhile we wait for Israel to put an end to this madness........

Sean Osborne said...

And now we know why continued construction at Arak is OK:

"The White House confirmed to the Washington Free Beacon on Monday that the final details of the plan have yet to be worked out, meaning that Iran is not yet beholden to a six month freeze its nuclear activities."

What Bibi and many others have lambasted as a "bad deal" is not even a complete deal.

The outright deception in the whole affair is far, far greater than anyone has up to now even considered possible.

So, Bibi, what are you and your Cabinet waiting for, an Iranian invitation to bomb their nuclear weapons facilities?

Sean Osborne said...

Anon,

There was a mild 4.5 quake several hundred miles off the coast from Charleston, SC on October 8, 2013.

However, the fact of the matter is that this quake was 6 miles deep in the earth's crus.

Therefore the quake had nothing to do with the unsubstantiated InfoWars nonsense from Alex Jones, et al, about missing nukes or nuclear detonations. That's all a bunch of wild-eyed conspiracy garbage not worth one second of anyone's concern.

mark3210 said...

Debka did mention that Israel's security cabinet was meeting yesterday for an unusually long session that was expected to continue today.

Certainly possible tonight could be the night.

Jeremy Lobb said...

Hi Sean,

What amazes me is the shock that Obozo has once again misled the public and the world at large:-)!

It is his normal deception and ways. Has he ever produced his American birth certificate, proved his collage education or any other normal thing that would be called for by the US constitution? Afraid not.....

So we can watch as he leads the US and the rest of the world into destruction. Probably starting within the next few weeks.

Let's pray for peace but prepare for war. Keep your post coming.

God Bless
jeri

Sean Osborne said...

Yup. I do not doubt for a second that Bibi and his Cabinet are fully aware of the deception (flat-out, bald-faced lies in fact) coming from Zero's Administration about this charade.

On top of this, I mean, really, how pathetically bad is it when the Ayatollah's utterly despicable terrorist regime in Iran is more truthful and forthcoming about what this deal constitutes than Zero & Co.

Beyond my worst nightmare. And we've got many more months of this, and worse, to endure yet.

mark3210 said...

Sean,
We are now just a few days away from the final new moon of 2013!

Surely this next week will be of critical importance!

Yesterday, Netanyahu said Israel will serve as a light to banish the darkness of a nuclear Iran. He reminded us that everyone celebrated an agreement with North Korea also.

Sean Osborne said...

Yup, I was just looking at our crescent sliver moon sitting low in the southeastern sky.

It's a cold, very still early morning - the kind of morning I'm hoping will afford a glimpse of a "victorious" Comet ISON (International Scientific Optical Network) which survived its close encounter with our sun.

All of these things were made by the LORD God as signs, and given the situation we have as the end of 2013... I think a pretty spectacular sign might be in order, but that's just me.

So, I'm "Watching" e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g very closely, and today's data collection effort begins with looking for a comet that no one thought would still exist at this time; a comet that could provide a really incredible show in the heavens.

Comet ISON is moving at a tremendous velocity after the sling-shot effect, so a dark, moonless sky in early December might just give us a performance like we've never seen before.

Comet ISON or the IAF... who will perform better in early December?

mark3210 said...

I wonder if NASA really thought Comet ISON would disintegrate or if that's just what they told the public.

I don't trust NASA anymore than other parts of the government.

Sean, do you think there's much risk that ISON could pose a threat to Earth?

Sean Osborne said...

Mark,

It wasn't just a few scientists working for NASA, it was most of the astrophysical community who suggested that Comet ISON might not survive. No one ever said that it would definitely be destroyed by the sun's gravitational pull.

As with many things of an astrophysical nature modern-day scientists are only guessing and most of that is based upon knowledge that has been acquired in just the last 50 years or less.

It's not that they can't be trusted IMHO, it is that they are but children looking at and speaking about the Creation of the LORD God they can barely come to fathom.